Second Floor,
NEWS RELEASE Contact:
For Immediate release Tel: +44 (0) 7812
822 643
Wednesday, 25 April 2007 e-mail:
Tax revenues from
'Scottish oil' may be less than calculated by the Financial
Times
An article in yesterday’s Financial Times1
claims that future revenues from
The FT article states:
A Financial Times
analysis shows that the current high level of oil prices would allow
However, the Scottish
National party’s plan to build a £90bn oil fund to endow the nation with riches
in the future looks to be unrealistic because every penny of oil revenues would
be needed to finance current public expenditure.
However, the production data used by the
Financial Times may be too high:
Within a decade of
independence,
Publicly available data suggests ‘3m barrels of
oil (or equivalents) a day in 2007’ and ‘fewer than 1m
by 2020’ is too optimistic.
‘Barrels of oil equivalent’ means oil plus
natural gas, although gas is otherwise never measured in barrels, without
specifying how much of either. According to UKOOA,
“Production in 2006 was 2.9 million barrels”, i.e. 2.9 million barrels per day
(Mb/d) of oil and gas, and “Production in 2007 is expected to rise to 3-3.1
million barrels”2. This is unlikely.
The US Energy Information Administration has
In the longer term, the
Between the period when UK oil and
gas production peaked, 1999/2000, and now, UK production has more or less
followed UKOOA’s ‘current production’ scenario, as
opposed to their more optimistic ‘current production plus potential’ scenario.
In the above graph, published July 2006, UKOOA
forecasts a mini-revival in oil and gas production from 2005-2010. This revival
has never occurred, and as discussed above, it never will7. This
begs the question. If UKOOA forecasting for a period so close at hand
(2005-2010) can be so wrong, i.e. over-optimistic, is the forecast to 2020
similarly over-optimistic?
In summary, the Financial Times analysis
suggests that future tax revenues from North Sea oil production will be
insufficient to build up a Scottish ‘Oil Fund’. Data from the IEA, EIA, UKOOA
and DTI suggest that the Financial Times analysis might err on the
optimistic side.
Ends
Notes for editors:
1. '
2. ‘Treasury
Accused of Turning Blind Eye to
3. UK
DTI, ‘Natural gas supply and consumption’, http://www.dtistats.net/energystats/et4_1.xls.
From ‘Main Points’: “Total indigenous
4. IEA
Oil Market Report website: http://omrpublic.iea.org/. The March OMR, the
latest publicly available, forecasts a rise in oil production of 40,000
barrels/day (b/d) for 2007 compared to 2006. It states: “The
In
2006,
5.
6. UKOOA
Sustainable Development 2006 Report. Figure 19, p14. http://www.ukooa.co.uk/issues/sustainability/2006/pdf/report-2006.pdf
(4.1 Mb).
7. IEA’s
10 year Time Series,
DTI
monthly oil production data, 1975-present, crude oil only: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/pprs/full_production/monthly_oil_production/monthly_oil_production.htm
DTI
monthly associated gas production data, 1975-present: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/pprs/full_production/monthly_associated_gas_production/monthly_associated_gas_Production.htm
DTI
monthly dry gas production, 1995-present: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/pprs/full_production/monthly_dry_gas_production/monthly_dry_gas_production.htm
8. UKOOA
is now called Oil &
Gas UK. ‘New Representative Body Creates Stronger Voice for
9. The Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC) is a
UK-registered educational charity working to raise international
public awareness and promote better understanding of the world's oil and gas
depletion problems. Further information is available on its website.