ODAC News – Thu 15 Mar

 

1/    ODAC: UK was net oil importer in 2006         (Oil and Gas Journal, Tue 13 Mar)

2a/  US Housing Sickness: How Virulent, How Contagious?          (CIBC World Markets Inc., Tue 13 Mar)

2b/  Missed home payments hit markets  (BBC News, Tue 13 Mar)

2c/  World’s share dealers take fright over US loans crisis (The Times [UK], Thu 15 Mar)

2d/  Sub-prime saga could prove very nasty [Business editorial]     (The Times, Thu 15 Mar)

3/   White House seeks to cut geothermal research funds (Reuters, Tue 13 Mar)

4/   The Precarious Future of Coal           (MIT Technology Review, Wed 14 Mar)

5/   BP says oil and gas recovery crucial  (Arabian Business, Wed 14 Mar)

6/   [US] Army Foresees Natural Gas Crisis         (DefenseTech, Wed 14 Mar)

7/   Kuwait looking to natural gas, nuclear options (Gulf Times, Thu 15 Mar)

8/   Labour crisis could stall oil and gas boom      (Arabian Business, Wed 14 Mar)

9/   UK Seminar: Oil and the World Economy, CGES, London, 21 March 2007

 

1 ton of crude = approx 7.3 barrels of oil (6.6-8.0 bbl. of crude oil with 7.333 bbl. taken as average)

100 million tonnes/year = 2 million barrels/day (approx)

mbd OR mn b/d OR Mb/d = million barrels per day

mn cf/d OR Mcf/d = million cubic feet per day

 

Quotations from articles are now always in this type of chevron: <<>>

If an ODAC comment is within an article, it will begin with:  ODAC:            where appropriate for clarification.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

1/         ODAC: UK was net oil importer in 2006    (Oil and Gas Journal, Tue 13 Mar)

 

http://www.ogj.com/articles/article_display.cfm?article_id=286952

 

UKOOA seem to be changing their tune. Until as recently as the end of last year they were adamant the UK would be a net oil exporter until 2010. Indeed, their Economic report 2006 states (p13): “The UK has been self-sufficient in oil for the last 25 years and is expected to remain so for the next 4 or 5 years, if current new developments proceed as planned.” What is really odd about this statement is that the UK had been a net oil importer for 5 months (Jan – May) when this report was released in July! In the following article UKOOA forecast the UK to be a net oil exporter to 2008, although they avoid using such an early date by saying “the UK will become a net importer of oil from 2009 onwards”: Both the IEA and EIA think it will be touch and go whether or not the UK will be a net exporter this year, and no chance for next. It would be useful if UKOOA could release a list of the oil fields they expect to counteract the 150,000 – 250,000 b/d that will be lost to depletion next year:

 

<<The UK became a net importer of oil for most of 2006, according to the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre (ODAC) in Aberdeen. "It is time for the UK government to let go of the idea that the UK will be a net oil exporter until 2010 and accept we are now dependent on imports," ODAC said.

 

Data published by the UK Department for Trade and Industry showed that the UK imported oil during every month in 2006 except for June. DTI forecasts that the UK will export oil for a few months during 2007 and see a decline in domestic oil production. From 2008, the International Energy Agency and the US Energy Information Administration expect the UK to be a net oil importer.

 

In May 2006 the UK imported its highest net volume over that year of 1.357 million tonnes of oil compared with 100,000 tonnes of oil in March, which was the lowest volume. In June the UK exported 298,000 tonnes.

 

A spokeswoman for the UK Offshore Operators' Association said the difference in oil imports and indigenous production in 2006 was small. "Last year's dip can be attributed to lower-than-expected North Sea production, owing in part to delays in new fields coming on stream, reservoir performance, and maintenance programs. Global constraints on resources, including equipment and personnel, also had an impact on activity levels in the UK."

 

Crude oil production in the UK in 2006 was an estimated 1.6 million b/d, while consumption was an estimated 1.7 million b/d. She added that major projects are expected to come on stream in 2007 and 2008.

 

"Based on the most recent information given to us by our members, we believe it now likely that the UK will become a net importer of oil from 2009 onwards. However, indigenous production could still provide 90% of the UK's oil needs in 2010," the spokeswoman said. >>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

All Item 2 articles are about the, for want of a better word, crash that is currently taking place in the U.S. so-called subprime mortgage market. This might seem like it has nothing to do with oil. However, as The Times business editor explains today (Thu) in an editorial (‘Sub-prime saga could prove very nasty’), the implications are potentially severe, leading to a fall in U.S. oil consumption (although there have not actually been any mainstream articles suggesting this). If oil consumption falls, OPEC will have to drop their production to keep prices up. Their track record is hardly exemplary:

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

2a/        US Housing Sickness: How Virulent, How Contagious?     (CIBC World Markets Inc., Tue 13 Mar)

 

http://research.cibcwm.com/economic_public/download/mimar07.pdf  (PDF, 890 Kb)

 

Second article, p8. A brief review of the current US housing market difficulties with charts/graphs. CIBC WM think the worst is yet to come.

 

<<The FOMC used the term “leveling” to give a hopeful spin to recent developments in the housing sector. But when judged by the best metrics, US housing prices, construction and mortgage markets are still weakening, and pose downside economic risks.

 

Building permits and starts are already off some 30% from their peak (Chart 1), but past cyclical crunches for housing have seen on the order of a 50% plunge. While that’s not our call, such an outcome might be in play if the Fed failed to provide any interest rate relief. Moreover, much of the hit to economic activity lies ahead.

 

... Sales don’t provide much encouragement yet for a bottoming (Chart 2). Pending existing home sales (measured when the deal is signed) renewed their decline in January. That points to a drop in the more widely watched existing home sales figures (reported on closing) for February. New home sales reports have also weakened sharply, and the truth is even worse, as the increasing number of cancelled purchases (due to financing troubles) are never erased from the data.

 

... The price data included in the new and existing home sales releases can be heavily tilted by changes in the mix of houses. Instead, keep an eye on the newest measure, the S&P Case-Shiller index. It controls for the mix of houses, and includes the full range of house prices. Unlike the earlier descent in the median house price series, the C-S data show that the slide has only just begun (Chart 3). Little wonder, then, that the macro consequences of house price declines are not yet observable...>>

 

 

2b/        Missed home payments hit markets        (BBC News, Tue 13 Mar)

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6447973.stm

 

<<Late mortgage payments and home repossessions in the US have hit their highest level since records began, official figures showed.

 

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) data for the last three months of 2006 confirm investor fears that the sector is struggling and may weaken more.

 

... Sub-prime lender Accredited Home Lenders Holding saw 65% wiped off its value on Tuesday, having lost 28% a day earlier [looks like a quote from John Kenneth Galbraith's Crash of '29], after it revealed that it may have to raise extra funds, seek debt waivers, cut jobs and put back its earnings announcement.

 

... Late or missed payments on mortgages rose to 4.95% the MBA figures showed, rising to 13.3% in the sub-prime market.

 

And lenders launched repossession actions against more than one in every 200 mortgage borrowers in the period.

 

The figures were the highest in the 37-year history MBA's national delinquency survey.

 

"Unfortunately, it appears delinquency rates will likely worsen before they improve," said Gina Martin analyst at Wachovia Securities.

 

... Sub-prime lenders provide money to clients with a poor credit history, and the current problems have been sparked by a rise in defaults and bad loans.

 

These, in turn, have been triggered in part by a relentless rise in interest rates from rock-bottom levels in the past four years, and falling house prices and rates of homebuilding in many parts of the US.

 

Another lender, New Century revealed that US markets regulator the Securities & Exchange Commission was investigating it. New Century has stopped making loans and its shares have been suspended, with some analysts now predicting bankruptcy...>>

 

 

2c/        World’s share dealers take fright over US loans crisis        (The Times [UK], Thu 15 Mar)

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/united_states/article1517371.ece

 

<< Share dealers around the globe took fright again yesterday, marking prices sharply lower on worries that the US sub-prime lending implosion could destabilise financial markets and slow economic growth.

 

... Dozens of lenders to Americans with no credit record or poor credit records have folded in recent months as their loans have turned sour. Official data on soaring defaults added to the jitters on Tuesday.

 

… Jim Rogers, the investment expert and former business partner of George Soros, predicted that falling real estate prices would trigger more defaults and affect other asset classes. “You can’t believe how bad it’s going to get before it gets any better,” Mr Rogers said. “It is going to be a huge mess. When markets turn from bubble to reality, a lot of people get burnt.” >>

 

 

2d/        Sub-prime saga could prove very nasty [Business editorial]            (The Times, Thu 15 Mar)

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article1517376.ece

 

<<The worldwide fall in stock prices and the wild ride on Wall Street yesterday was blamed on the carnage in American sub-prime lending — worryingly, a much more credible, connected scapegoat. The sheer scale of the sub-prime problem, its linkages to the heart of the financial system, the opacity of what is really going on and the knock-on effects on consumers in the world’s most important economy all point to this being a serious issue.

 

On numbers alone US sub-prime lending has to be taken seriously. About $1,200 billion (£620 billion) has been extended to the poor or credit-tarnished of America. Delinquency rates on sub-prime adjustable rate mortgages are running at 14.4 per cent. Sub-prime is no longer a minority sport: one in five mortgages in the US last year was to a sub-prime borrower.

 

The problem will, therefore, be felt far and wide. First, on the housing market. With US house prices down by 9 per cent and falling, a lot of borrowers are already in negative equity. Lehman Brothers issued a report on Monday forecasting $225 billion in US mortgage defaults in 2007-08. This is probably a conservative estimate. This will depress the housing market the US, where housing has a knock-on effect on confidence and, given the size of the construction industry, on growth.

 

Second, the health of the financial sector. Mortgage originators are already folding by the dozen. The more serious question is the impact still to be felt on banks that lent originators money. Further down the chain are the hedge funds, pension funds and insurance companies that bought securitised mortgages from them. Most of these investments are excellent quality and well secured. A minority is toxic waste. But no one knows exactly where it lurks. And that makes the markets nervous.

 

Third, consumer spending. After years of easy money and loose credit, the average American suddenly finds money is tight. It is not just that interest rates are higher, but also that the previously plentiful supplies of fresh credit for higher risk borrowers have dried up. That may quickly feed through into lower consumer spending, which could slow US and global growth. Shanghai was a nasty surprise; sub-prime will be a longer, nastier saga.>>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

3/         White House seeks to cut geothermal research funds       (Reuters, Tue 13 Mar)

 

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2007-03-13T172237Z_01_N13459469_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-GEOTHERMAL-FUNDING.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

 

<<The Bush administration wants to eliminate federal support for geothermal power just as many U.S. states are looking to cut greenhouse gas emissions and raise renewable power output.

 

... "The Department of Energy has not requested funds for geothermal research in our fiscal-year 2008 budget," said Christina Kielich, a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy. "Geothermal is a mature technology. Our focus is on breakthrough energy [ODAC - like oil shales ?] research and development."

 

The administration of George W. Bush has made renewable energy a priority as it seeks to wean the United States off foreign oil, but it emphasizes use of biofuels like ethanol and biodiesel for vehicles and nuclear research for electricity.

 

"In spite of its enormous potential, the geothermal option for the United States has been largely ignored," a recent study led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said.

 

Last year, the DOE requested no funding for geothermal for the 2007 fiscal year, after funding averaged about $26 million over the previous six years, but Congress restored $5 million. This year, the DOE's $24.3 billion budget request includes a 38 percent federal spending increase for nuclear power, but nothing for geothermal.

 

... Leland "Roy" Mink, who until last October was geothermal program director at the DOE, said he thinks the White House's waning interest in geothermal is a mistake. He said he left the DOE when he saw the Department was cutting funding.

 

"It's far from a mature technology," said Mink, who is now working on a geothermal project in Idaho. "There's a lot to do. For starters, we need to develop drill bits that last longer. It's a hostile environment down there."

 

While its industry is largely undeveloped, the United States is still the largest producer of geothermal electricity in the world. U.S. geothermal power generation in 2005 was 0.36 percent of national power generation and geothermal capacity is rated at 2,828 megawatts, with almost all in California, according to the Geothermal Energy Association.>>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

4/         The Precarious Future of Coal     (MIT Technology Review, Wed 14 Mar)

 

http://technologyreview.com/Energy/18389/

 

<<A new MIT report says that much more effort is needed to develop and test technology that will make clean-coal power plants economical and practical.

 

Energy experts from MIT have released a long-awaited report on the future of coal. The report recommends that much more be done to develop technology for decreasing the impact of burning coal on global warming. The report also challenges some conventional thinking about the best way forward. It criticizes current efforts by the Department of Energy (DOE) and calls for an approximately $5 billion, 10-year program to demonstrate technology for capturing and storing carbon dioxide released by coal-fired power plants.

 

The report, based on a study by 13 MIT faculty members, comes at a time when growing concerns about global warming are making it increasingly likely that governments worldwide will impose a price on carbon-dioxide emissions to force a cut in the release of this important greenhouse gas. Nevertheless, coal, the leading source of carbon-dioxide emissions from electricity generation, will continue to be a major source of electricity, say the authors of the report. That's because even with a high price on carbon, coal is abundant and probably necessary to meet fast-growing demand for energy worldwide.

 

... And although there are a few carbon-sequestration projects going on around the world, none of these has been put together with the sort of careful monitoring required to assure the public and energy investors that long-term, extremely high-volume carbon-dioxide storage is possible.

 

 

The report challenged the idea, argued by some energy experts, that a new type of coal plant--one that converts coal into a gas before burning it--will make it easier and cheaper to capture carbon dioxide, compared with collecting it from the smokestacks of conventional power plants. The MIT experts say that several factors make the picture more complicated. Such coal gasification doesn't work well with low-grade coal, for example, and both the new and the conventional plants will require major changes to capture carbon dioxide, according to the MIT report...>>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

5/         BP says oil and gas recovery crucial       (Arabian Business, Wed 14 Mar)

 

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9412:bp-says-oil-and-gas-recovery-crucial&Itemid=1

 

The message is clear enough. Big oil is not finding enough oil from new fields/ discoveries, they need to get more from existing fields:

 

<<Maximising recovery from existing oil and gas fields will be crucial to meeting the world's growing energy needs as the number of undiscovered fields diminishes and the cost of new exploration increases, according to a BP representative speaking at the 15th Middle East Oil and Gas Show held in Bahrain from March 11-14.

 

"Demand for energy is expected to increase 50% to 60% by 2030, much of it from newly emerging markets," explained Peter Roberts, Subsurface Manager, BP Abu Dhabi. "At BP, we believe the industry needs to look to increasing recovery from existing fields to meet this rising demand."

 

Roberts explained how up to 50% of BP's reserves growth since 2002 has come through the application of good reservoir management techniques which help to extend the productive field life.

 

"Technology and reservoir management has been essential to the progress of BP over the past five years, enabling us to add around 8 billion barrels of oil equivalent to our resource base through exploration, an additional 8 billion barrels from appraisal and revisions and to shift some 9 billion barrels of oil equivalent from non-proved to proved reserves," illustrated Roberts...>>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

6/         [US] Army Foresees Natural Gas Crisis   (DefenseTech, Wed 14 Mar)

 

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003358.html

 

The article has a link to the original PDF file, but it does not work. You need to go to this page http://dccw.hqda.pentagon.mil/services/RFP1.asp then select the line where the description = “Army Natural Gas Study - Performance Work Statement (PWS)”, date = 13 March 2007. A message will pop up saying you have to log in, but the PDF file opens anyway:

 

<<The Pentagon has been talking recently about going oil-free by 2050, a fairly radical initiative given the hidebound nature of the institution and the complexity of the technologies it employs.

 

But oil apparently is among the least of the Army's energy problems.

 

According to this newly-minted memorandum , the Army's assistant chief of staff for installation management is more worried that the worldwide supply of natural gas will dry up within 25 years. Says the memo:

 

"Current Army assumption is that natural gas may cease to be a viable fueld for the Army within the next 25 years based on price volatility and affordable supply availability."

 

If the Army's assumptions are correct, the situation may "threaten the Army's ability to house, train and deploy soldiers," adds the memo.

 

What will replace natural gas? This is certainly not my field of expertise, but perhaps readers or other bloggers may have something to add here.

 

I know the Air Force is keen about a new form of synthetic fuel derived from liquefied coal to power its jet aircraft. A demonstration is underway with the B-52, which is actually using a slightly different synthetic product derived from -- oops -- natural gas. The fuel is made using a process known as Fischer-Trope, which has the unfortunate distinction of being employed by only two countries -- Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa.>>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

7/         Kuwait looking to natural gas, nuclear options      (Gulf Times, Thu 15 Mar)

 

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=138264&version=1&template_id=48&parent_id=28

 

Kuwait does not have enough natural gas, but it is not the only place. Dubai desperately needs more gas, more than it is getting from the just-opened Dolphin gas pipeline from Qatar. Articles in this weeks press report on the currently-being-built Nabucco gas pipeline. According to Wikipedia, sources of gas for Nabucco will include Iran and Azerbaijan. At the moment, Iran has no spare natural gas to export, but maybe by 2020 it will (many Iranian experts are doubtful). And Azerbaijani gas production is not exactly high, yet. And Russia is doing its best to buy out all the gas from the other Central Asian countries. LNG will be available, at a price:

 

<<Kuwait is considering an import terminal for liquefied natural gas, gas imports from Iran and Iraq and nuclear power to help it match soaring demand for electricity, its energy minister said yesterday.

 

Kuwait was in discussions with Royal Dutch Shell and BG Group on a possible LNG import terminal and also for exploration and development of the country’s gas reserves, Sheikh Ali al-Jarrah al-Sabah said.

 

“We are discussing an LNG terminal and have already started talking to major players in that field,” he told reporters.

Another potential option is importing gas from Iran and Iraq, he said, and Kuwait is in talks with both.

 

Power demand in the region was rising so quickly that Kuwait and other Gulf Arab states were seriously considering nuclear power plants.

 

“We are in very serious talks (about nuclear power),” he said. “We have to consider alternatives with the cost of fuel and gas.”

 

Any outages at power plants could cause a repeat of the power outs this summer that hit the country last year, he said.

As consumers crank up air conditioning units in the summer, power demand could reach as much as 10,000MW, equivalent to Kuwait’s power capacity at the moment, he said. The country aims to add another 1500MW of capacity by the summer to meet peak demand, Sheikh Ali added...  >>

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

8/         Labour crisis could stall oil and gas boom            (Arabian Business, Wed 14 Mar)

 

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9379:labour-crisis-could-stall-oil-and-gas-boom&Itemid=1

 

It is beginning to look like even if there is enough oil to prevent Peak for a decade or two, we do not have the manpower:

 

<<Management consultants, Booz Allen Hamilton says the oil and gas industry has stretched its resources to breaking point, creating the potential to stall the oil and gas boom that is currently occurring. From the industrial platforms of oil rigs to air-conditioned design offices, the oil and gas industry is confronted with a shortage of brawn and brains so severe that it threatens to stall exploration and production growth around the world. In an interview with Oil & Gas Middle East, Raed Kombargi from Booz Allen Hamilton explains the situation… >>

 

An interview follows.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

9 /        UK Seminar: Oil and the World Economy, CGES, London, 21 March 2007

 

The London-based Centre for Global Energy Studies (CGES) is holding its fifth one-day seminar chaired by H.E. Sheikh Zaki Yamani, chairman of CGES. From one of the conference fliers:

Date & Venue: 21st March 2007 at the Carlton Tower Hotel, Cadogan Square, London SW1

Programme Incudes:

The Changing Political Scene and Oil
World politics in the light of energy developments
What can the US do next in the Middle East?
An oil producer’s view
The Global Economy and Oil
Can China and India’s economic boom continue?
Do high oil prices harm economic growth?
Oil Market Assessment and Price Outlook
Short-term oil market outlook
Should we worry about oil depletion?
Oil, Currencies and Inflation
The US Dollar’s weakness, is there more to come?

Speakers Incude:

Lord Howell of Guildford, Chief Opposition Spokesman on Foreign Affairs,
House of Lords and Member of the Board, CGES
Shukri Ghanem, Chairman of the Peoples’ Committee, National Oil Corporation of Libya
Phebe Marr, Author, Former Senior Fellow, US Institute of Peace and Member of the Experts of the
US Committee for the Iraq Study Group
Martin Wolf, Associate Editor & Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times
Jeffrey Culpepper, Head of Investment Banking, Merrill Lynch
Humphrey Percy, Chief Executive Officer, House of London and The Middle East plc
Professor Tim Congdon CBE, Founder of Lombard Street Research
David Fyfe, Senior Oil Analyst, IEA
Leo Drollas, Deputy Executive Director, CGES

Seminar Programme (PDF, 19 Kb)

Seminar Flyer - contains booking form (PDF, 82 Kb)

**********************************************************************************************************