ODAC News

 

Sunday 17 June

 

The Oil Depletion Analysis Centre

 

 

1/   World oil supplies are set to run out faster than expected, warn scientists         (The Independent, Thu 14 Jun)

2a/  Are global market bubbles set to blow?         (BBC News, Thu 14 Jun)

2b/  We're all doomed?   (BBC News [Robert Peston, BBC's business editor], Wed 13 Jun)

3a/  Food prices defy inflation [short video]           (BBC News, June 2007)

3b/  Floods and drought send price of wheat soaring         (Financial Times, Fri 15 Jun)

4a/  BG urges different oil, gas taxation off UK      (Oil and Gas Journal, Thu 14 Jun)

4b/  Shell and ExxonMobil scale down North Sea presence           (Financial Times, Fri 15 Jun)

4c/  North Sea running dry says BP         (ThisIsMoney, Wed 13 Jun)

4d/  SHOCK AS SHELL PUTS OIL ASSETS UP FOR SALE         (Aberdeen Press and Journal, Fri 15 Jun)

5/   Petrol problems about peak oil, not snake oil  (The Age [Australia], Thu 14 Jun)

6/   Russia

6a/  New Low Cost Air Carrier Set Up in Russia    (FC Novosti, Fri 15 Jun)

6b/  Half of Gas from Shtokman Field to Be Liquefied        (FC Novosti, Fri 15 Jun)

6c/  Russian Gas Supplies to China May Be Postponed    (FC Novosti, Wed 13 Jun)

7/   Oil demand ‘rising faster than expected’         (Financial Times, Tue 12 Jun)

8/   Boeing forecasts near tripling of air traffic        (Financial Times, Wed 13 Jun)

 

**********************************************************************************************************

1/         World oil supplies are set to run out faster than expected, warn scientists      (The Independent, Thu 14 Jun)

http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article2656034.ece

Comment:    “A World Without Oil” - This was the frontline heading of the Independent newspaper in the UK on Thursday 14th June, with a map showing various countries oil reserves. "What oil nations say they have left" took up the whole of page 2.

 

The story was in response to BP's claim the day before, when it released its BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2007, "that the world still has enough 'proven' reserves to provide 40 years of consumption at current rates". The story was also picked up by Radio 4 News in the morning of the 14th, but otherwise the BBC ignored the story. Some of the credit for the story goes to Jeremy Leggett of SolarCentury and "Half Gone" fame who put the Independent in ODAC's direction.

 

The story was also covered by:

 

Oil crisis 'to hit in four years' - Melbourne Herald Sun, Australia. Exactly the same story was in: NEWS.com.au, Australia; Advertiser Adelaide, Australia; Daily Telegraph, Australia; Courier Mail, Australia; Sunday Times.au, [Perth] Australia.

Scientists reportedly dispute BP's oil-reserve forecast - MarketWatch

Oil supplies dwindling quicker than expected, scientists warn - Hamilton Spectator

Scientists warn that oil will start to run out in four years' time - Irish Independent, Ireland

Scientists warn that oil supplies will start to run out in four years' time - Belfast Telegraph, United Kingdom

 

Article:    Scientists have criticised a major review of the world's remaining oil reserves, warning that the end of oil is coming sooner than governments and oil companies are prepared to admit.

 

BP's Statistical Review of World Energy, published yesterday, appears to show that the world still has enough "proven" reserves to provide 40 years of consumption at current rates. The assessment, based on officially reported figures, has once again pushed back the estimate of when the world will run dry.

 

However, scientists led by the London-based Oil Depletion Analysis Centre, say that global production of oil is set to peak in the next four years before entering a steepening decline which will have massive consequences for the world economy and the way that we live our lives.

 

According to "peak oil" theory our consumption of oil will catch, then outstrip our discovery of new reserves and we will begin to deplete known reserves.

 

Colin Campbell, the head of the depletion centre, said: "It's quite a simple theory and one that any beer drinker understands. The glass starts full and ends empty and the faster you drink it the quicker it's gone."

 

Dr Campbell, is a former chief geologist and vice-president at a string of oil majors including BP, Shell, Fina, Exxon and ChevronTexaco. He explains that the peak of regular oil - the cheap and easy to extract stuff - has already come and gone in 2005. Even when you factor in the more difficult to extract heavy oil, deep sea reserves, polar regions and liquid taken from gas, the peak will come as soon as 2011, he says.

 

This scenario is flatly denied by BP, whose chief economist Peter Davies has dismissed the arguments of "peak oil" theorists.

 

"We don't believe there is an absolute resource constraint. When peak oil comes, it is just as likely to come from consumption peaking, perhaps because of climate change policies as from production peaking."

 

In recent years the once-considerable gap between demand and supply has narrowed. Last year that gap all but disappeared. The consequences of a shortfall would be immense. If consumption begins to exceed production by even the smallest amount, the price of oil could soar above $100 a barrel. A global recession would follow.

 

Jeremy Leggett, like Dr Campbell, is a geologist-turned conservationist whose book Half Gone: Oil, Gas, Hot Air and the Global Energy Crisis brought " peak oil" theory to a wider audience. He compares industry and government reluctance to face up to the impending end of oil, to climate change denial.

 

"It reminds me of the way no one would listen for years to scientists warning about global warming," he says. "We were predicting things pretty much exactly as they have played out. Then as now we were wondering what it would take to get people to listen."

 

In 1999, Britain's oil reserves in the North Sea peaked, but for two years after this became apparent, Mr Leggett claims, it was heresy for anyone in official circles to say so. "Not meeting demand is not an option. In fact, it is an act of treason," he says.

 

... In the 1970s Chris Skrebowski was a long-term planner for BP. Today he edits the Petroleum Review and is one of a growing number of industry insiders converting to peak theory. "I was extremely sceptical to start with," he now admits. "We have enough capacity coming online for the next two-and-a-half years. After that the situation deteriorates."

 

... Two-thirds of the world's oil reserves lie in the Middle East and increasing demand will have to be met with massive increases in supply from this region.

 

BP's Statistical Review is the most widely used estimate of world oil reserves but as Dr Campbell points out it is only a summary of highly political estimates supplied by governments and oil companies.

 

As Dr Campbell explains: "When I was the boss of an oil company I would never tell the truth. It's not part of the game."

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

2a/        Are global market bubbles set to blow?          (BBC News, Thu 14 Jun)

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6748803.stm

 

Comment:   Quite lengthy for a BBC News article, gives optimistic/ pessimistic points of view.

 

Article:    There is a strange fascination in blowing a bubble, when despite your better judgement, you keep willing it to get bigger regardless of the dangers.

 

Then, suddenly, the violent pop that leaves you picking bubblegum off your eyebrows, or crying soapy tears.

 

For many observers, global markets are getting dangerously close to such a bursting point.

 

Until recently, we have been living in a period of low global interest rates that have let consumers and companies borrow money cheaply.

 

That has driven demand for mortgages, let companies pay increasingly large sums for takeovers, and allowed consumers to spend freely.

 

And the results of this credit splurge are hard to ignore:

 

 

UK house prices have doubled in the past 10 years.

China's main stock index has quadrupled in value since the start of 2006.

The UK's FTSE 100 and US S&P 500 stock indexes are at levels not seen in almost seven years.

Commodity prices have been buoyed by strong global demand, pushing some such as copper to records.

Merger and acquisition activity has taken off, and private equity firms are now in control of some of the world's biggest brands.

But as the records have continued to tumble, concerns have kept on mounting...

 

 

2b/        We're all doomed? (BBC News [Robert Peston, BBC's business editor], Wed 13 Jun)

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2007/06/were_all_doomed.html

 

Comment:    From the introduction near the top of the page: “I'm Robert Peston, the BBC's business editor. This blog is my regular take on the business stories and issues that matter.”

 

Article:    One of the great, global, economic forces of our age, which I’ve bored you rigid discussing in this blog, is that it has been possible to borrow long-term money at relatively low interest rates.

 

For the past few years, the impact of these low long-term interest rates has been visible in a surge in borrowing by individuals and companies together with the related phenomenon of rising prices of almost every kind of asset or commodity. Here are just three important manifestations:

 

a) UK house prices that keep going up and up – almost regardless of what the Bank of England does to short-term interest rates;

 

b) share prices, that have increased more-or-less in a straight line since the spring of 2003;

 

c) a boom in takeovers of companies, financed by borrowing, and a great wave of repurchases of shares by companies, again funded by debt.

 

Now, a fall in longer term interest rates is simply the corollary of a rise in the price of certain US Government bonds.

 

And what has kept the price of those bonds high has been two trends.

 

First, the accumulation of vast foreign exchange reserves by China, Japan and other (largely Asian) exporting nations, which have been invested in US government bonds.

 

Second, a decision taken some years ago by large insurers and pension funds to become more risk averse, and reduce their exposure to shares while increasing their holdings of bonds.

 

Now according to analysts, for some years long-term interest rates have been significantly lower than they should have been on the basis of their normal historical relationship with short-term interest rates and the health of the global economy.

 

Which is why what has been happening over the past few days is important, though largely unreported outside of specialist financial publications: there has been a sharp fall in the price of 10-year US government bonds, known as US Treasuries, and thus a precipitate rise in the benchmark price of borrowing for ten years. Yesterday, the yield on 10-year US Treasuries rose to its highest level for more than five years (to 5.27%).

 

This is much more important to all of us than what the Bank of England does to short-term interest rates.

 

For example, the rise in these long-term market interest rates pushes up the price of borrowing for our big banks and building societies and will probably feed through to the interest rates on new fixed-rate mortgages.

 

Which could prick the housing-market bubble.

 

… But there could in time be a seriously negative impact on the price of shares. Higher longer term interest rates should eventually lead to a squeeze in the profits of companies, which would make shares in those companies less valuable.

 

The bond-market turmoil and fall of last week may turn out to be the beginning of the end of the current upswing in in shares, property, you name it, the possible end of an all-embracing bull market.

 

And that would mean, to quote Private Fraser, that "we're all doomed, doomed."

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

3a/        Food prices defy inflation [short video]           (BBC News, June 2007)

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/player/nol/newsid_6740000/newsid_6748000?redirect=6748005.stm&news=1&nbwm=1&nbram=1&bbwm=1&bbram=1

 

Comment:    Video, 2 min 43 sec. Good summary of what is causing inflation in global food prices. There are other reasons, but the video covers three of the main ones - a combination of weather e.g. drought in Australia, biofuels in the USA and increasing demand for food in e.g. China. Some of the details in the report are not quite correct, but generally ok. The impression the video gives is that increasing food prices is a long-term phenomena.

 

 

3b/        Floods and drought send price of wheat soaring     (Financial Times, Fri 15 Jun)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/bca9a74e-1add-11dc-8bf0-000b5df10621.html

 

Comment:    Expect a lot more food price articles this summer.

 

Article:    Wheat prices in the US and Europe hit their highest levels in more than a decade yesterday as drought and floods continued to threaten harvests in grain-producing regions across the globe.

 

The weather problems come at a time when global wheat stocks are expected to shrink to a 30-year low.

 

French wheat futures hit their highest level since the contract was launched in 1998, rising 4 per cent to €181 before easing back to €179.25. In Chicago, July wheat prices jumped 28½ cents to $6.18 a bushel, an 11-year high, gaining 33 per cent since the start of April after 24 hours of heavy rain added to fears of a poor harvest already hit by frost.

 

"You had a beautiful wheat crop that was lush and green that got nailed with frost and now you're getting rain when you're trying to harvest it," said Jerome Leman, broker at Wellington Commodities.

 

Fresh concerns have emerged this week about the state of the US winter wheat crop as heavy rains have hampered the progress of the harvest, leaving it vulnerable to disease. Flood warnings have been issued in Kansas, the largest wheat-growing state, and Oklahoma, with the harvest in both areas behind schedule.

 

"The world is approaching quite a precarious situation as far as global agriculture is concerned," says Gavin Maquire of Iowa Grain. "Demand for all agricultural staples has been rising consistently due to global economic and population growth and developments in the food-for-fuel sector."

 

This week, the US agriculture department reduced its forecast for US wheat production in the year to June 2008 by 5.93m bushels to 2.168bn bushels. Year-end stocks are expected to shrink to a 10-year low of 443m bushels.

 

Low stocks, weather problems and rising prices have attracted a flurry of speculative buying.

 

In Europe, yields have been affected by dry conditions in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Italy and Greece, and drought in Romania and Bulgaria.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

4a/        BG urges different oil, gas taxation off UK      (Oil and Gas Journal, Thu 14 Jun)

 

http://www.ogj.com/display_article/295386/7/ARTCL/none/none/BG-urges-different-oil,-gas-taxation-off-UK/?dcmp=OGJ.Daily.Update

 

Comment:    OGJ article - will be freely available for only one week.

 

With UK natural gas having gone from historically high prices a year ago to low prices now, the gas exploration sector does seem to be struggling, compared to the oil sector with record high oil prices. Here is where the UK gas sector is headed according to the UK Dept of Trade and industry: the DTI's UK Gas Reserves and Ultimate Recovery 2006 shows UK Gas Reserves falling to zero before 2020 (see the only graph, 'Gas Reserves V Time')

 

Article:    Energy companies developing gas reserves in the UK North Sea should have a different tax regime than those developing oil, a senior executive from BG Group PLC urged at a meeting in London.

 

Chris Cox, vice-president for UK upstream at BG Group, said the current high tax regime in the UK is having a material effect on investment decisions. Within the past 2 years, there have been two major increases in supplementary corporate tax (SCT), bringing it to 20%. Gordon Brown, UK prime minister in-waiting, did not change in his last budget as UK Chancellor the current corporation tax level of 50% and a total tax rate of 75% on production from older fields (OGJ Online, Mar. 21, 2007).

 

Uncertainties in demand may compromise the development of gas fields on the UK continental shelf (UKCS), according to a report commissioned by Oil & Gas UK. Low gas prices caused by a surplus of gas since the winter of 2005-06 are also hampering development along with increased production costs.

 

"Many gas discoveries will remain undeveloped without SCT relief or volume or time allowances for new fields," Cox warned at an Oil & Gas UK meeting looking at major policy issues for the UKCS.

 

According to the recently published UK White Energy Paper, the gas share of UK primary energy demand will rise to 40% in 2020.

 

Cox stressed that it is possible to reconcile the interests of the UK oil and gas industry and the treasury.

 

"The treasury is concerned about deadweight costs," he said. "They are scared that they might subsidize developments that would go ahead anyway if they gave it a tax break. If more developments went ahead, the government's take could go up; we've got to pitch it right."

 

Cox said there was scope to introduce a voluntary code to drive development timing and added that the fallow initiative—which encourages operators drill or surrender licenses on which no significant activity has occurred for 4 years—does not help with rapid development of new discoveries. Company misalignment and complex joint ventures are also jeopardizing new developments in the UK North Sea.

 

"Resource constraints and competition for funds lead to partner misalignment on development scenarios and timing," he said.

 

BG Group plans to drill seven exploration or appraisal wells this year.

 

 

4b/        Shell and ExxonMobil scale down North Sea presence     (Financial Times, Fri 15 Jun)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2a58d73a-1adc-11dc-8bf0-000b5df10621,_i_nbePage=5b566934-3013-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8.html

 

Comment:    Some how or other the sentences “Shell has also scrapped plans for a new building on its campus outside Aberdeen.” and “Shell insisted it was still committed to the North Sea” just don’t seem to flow. Note that the UK, according to the just published BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2007, had the third highest rate of oil depletion the world last year, after Turkmenistan and Chad (ThisIsMoney, item 4c, also states UK has the third highest rate, after Norway and Saudi Arabia!). The Buzzard field will delay depletion for one year, 2007, no more.

 

Article:    North Sea oil fields producing about 54,000 barrels a day have been put up for sale by Royal Dutch Shell and ExxonMobil, in the latest move by the big oil companies to scale down their presence in the region.

 

Shell has also scrapped plans for a new building on its campus outside Aberdeen.

 

The North Sea is one of the world's fastest-declining areas for oil production. The latest BP Statistical Review of World Energy shows UK output fell by 9.6 per cent last year - faster than any other country except Turkmenistan and Chad.

 

… Shell insisted it was still committed to the North Sea, and highlighted its £350minvestment in the Fife and St Fergus gas plants as evidence.

 

 

4c/        North Sea running dry says BP (ThisIsMoney, Wed 13 Jun)

 

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/investing-and-markets/article.html?in_article_id=421283&in_page_id=3

 

Comment:    ThisIsMoney interprets the BP's Statistical Review of World Energy as giving a bleak view of future UK gas and oil production. A spokesperson for Oil & Gas UK (ex-UKOOA) “said output should improve this year, adding that the North Sea had far more potential than BP's proven oil and gas reserve figures suggested.” Doubtful, but using R/P ratios as BP tend to do is notoriously misleading.

 

Article:    Britain only has enough gas and oil left under the North Sea to last six years at current production rates, leaving us increasingly exposed to volatile supplies from Russia and the Middle East.

 

The UK saw one of the most precipitous output declines of any nation last year, exceeded only by Saudi Arabia and Norway, BP's Statistical Review of World Energy revealed. The biggest jumps were achieved by the United Arab Emirates and Russia.

 

Despite major finds such as the Buzzard field, the outlook here is one of steady decline, with costs spiralling and yields sliding, the firm warned.

 

BP chief economist Peter Davies said: 'The industry is now focusing on the potential to maximise recovery for the twilight years of the resource base. We are not going to stop producing oil and gas in the UK, but the big oil and gas has clearly been found.'

 

The analysis will make grim reading for the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, who saw dramatic shortfalls in oil tax revenues last year - despite high world prices and hikes in levies on producers.

 

North Sea revenues are projected to slump 11% to £8.1bn this year, according to the Treasury's own figures.

 

The new figures will also exacerbate broader concerns about the resilience of the British economy, which is heavily dependent on its oil industry to prop up the ballooning trade deficit.

 

The gap between imports and exports narrowed to £6.3bn in April, the lowest since October 2005, thanks largely to an 18% jump in the amount oil sold abroad, the Office for National Statistics reported yesterday.

 

Trisha O'Reilly, of lobby group Oil & Gas UK, said output should improve this year, adding that the North Sea had far more potential than BP's proven oil and gas reserve figures suggested.

 

'The issue is how we can slow that rate of decline by attracting investment needed for exploration and new projects,' she said.

 

 

4d/        SHOCK AS SHELL PUTS OIL ASSETS UP FOR SALE        (Aberdeen Press and Journal, Fri 15 Jun)

 

http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=149212&command=displayContent&sourceNode=232919&home=yes&more_nodeId1=149221&contentPK=17570586

 

Comment:    The Aberdeen P&J takes a very dim view of Shell’s actions.

 

Article:    Energy giant Shell's long-term commitment to the north-east was questioned last night after it put a swathe of its North Sea operation up for sale and scrapped plans for a £25million headquarters.

 

The scale of the announcement, which will affect around 8% of Shell's daily oil output from the North Sea, sent shockwaves through the oil and gas industry.

 

But fears over the future of hundreds of jobs were mixed with optimism that the sale could prompt new operators to move in and extend the life of the maturing basin.

 

There was, however, widespread dismay at the firm's decision to axe plans for a landmark new office complex earmarked for its campus at Tullos in Aberdeen.

 

Shell said the new building, which was intended to bring all of its Aberdeen operations together on one site, was no longer needed.

 

... Jake Molloy, general secretary of the OILC union, said yesterday that including contractors, at least 1,000 jobs were directly affected by the asset sale.

 

He added: "This move does not look like a commitment to the North Sea; it suggests to me it is getting nearer the exit."

 

Graham Tran, regional organiser in Aberdeen with the Unite union (Amicus section), said: "Is it the start of a mass exodus from the North Sea? It could well be and it is certainly a worrying time."

 

... The assets being disposed of include operated interests in the Cormorant Alpha, Cormorant North, Tern, Eider, Kestrel and Pelican installations and non-operated stakes in Otter and Hudson.

 

The sale includes acreage, production licences and associated infrastructure, and accounts for around 27,200 barrels oil equivalent per day (boe/d) out of Shell's 350,000 boe/d output...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

5/         Petrol problems about peak oil, not snake oil            (The Age [Australia], Thu 14 Jun)

 

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/petrol-problems-about-peak-oil-not-snake-oil/2007/06/13/1181414372167.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

 

Comment:    Bruce Robinson, Convenor of ASPO-Australia, writes: “A bit of a coup in The Age today. Ken Davidson has put out a strong piece explaining that high petrol prices are the result of pressure on oil supply, not price gouging.”

 

It looks like the Australian government is pursuing the same daft policies as the UK govt – more very expensive road building.

 

Spring Street is the Central Business District of Melbourne.

 

Article:    It's time for Canberra and Spring Street to face the facts on transport.

 

IF YOU think petrol is expensive at $1.34 a litre, how will you feel if it is around $2.60 a litre without any adjustment for inflation by 2015? That is when Melbourne's third public-private partnership toll road connecting the Eastern Freeway with the western suburbs via tunnel is expected to be completed.

 

It is not a question that seems to have lodged in the collective brain of politicians in Canberra or Spring Street who want to make political capital out of motorists' perceptions that high prices are due to price-gouging by the oil cartel.

 

The real reason petrol prices are high is because crude oil is $74 a barrel compared to $35 a barrel in 2004. The price of crude is high because world demand is beginning to outstrip supply. World discovery of oil peaked in 1964 and has been declining ever since. The most likely production scenario is for an annual decline in world production of 2 to 3 per cent, so that world oil production will fall to about 1990 levels by 2020. In Australia, oil production peaked in 2001.

 

According to the Australian Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas: "High prices are the market signal that we urgently need transport and city planning that will reduce our oil dependence. Suggesting that high oil prices are temporary misleads the public and allows governments to delay difficult decisions."

 

The Victorian political and business establishment is in denial. The case against the east-west link in particular, and increased oil dependence in general, is made in the submission by the Institute for Sensible Transport (IST) to Sir Rod Eddington's inquiry into the tunnel link.

 

IST argues that outer suburban communities, with poor access to rail and bicycle infrastructure, are likely to be hardest hit by petrol price rises. The submission develops a number of inter-related themes: "Reduced car use … reduces congestion, lowers fuel bills, reduces emissions and encourages physical activity. Melbourne's resilience to the emerging challenges of peak oil, climate change and sedentary lifestyle diseases (such as obesity) will be considerably strengthened by moving to a less automobile-dependent society."

 

The policies the IST supports include major rail extensions in the outer suburbs, expanding the bicycle network and connecting it to train stations, congestion pricing to discourage car use in the CBD, high-occupancy vehicle lanes on freeways and elimination of the Fringe Benefit Tax for motor vehicles that subsidises 40 per cent of peak-hour car travel.

 

… Instead, Melburnians are being set up for a multibillion-dollar tollway connecting the Eastern Freeway to the western suburbs, even though an independent inquiry rejected a similar proposal in 2003. The key question posed by the Eddington inquiry is how this will be financed if cost recovery requires tolls higher than motorists are willing to pay.

 

The answer — public subsidies — is contained in the submission by ABN AMRO, which hopes to be the successful banker to the deal. The position is put more succinctly in a study by Ernst & Young, also a player in the highly lucrative business of setting up PPPs: "Politically acceptable car toll levels (no more than $4 to $5 in today's money) will result in these 'next generation' projects requiring significant public sector subsidies or 'contributions' to make them viable under the PPP model. The days of self-funded toll roads are over."

 

If PPP tollways can't pay for themselves, that should be the end of it, especially as the tunnel offers no enduring solution to congestion, unlike the cost-free rail option…

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

6/         Russia

 

6a/        New Low Cost Air Carrier Set Up in Russia    (FC Novosti, Fri 15 Jun)

 

http://www.fcinfo.ru/themes/basic/materials-rfcm-index.asp?folder=3352

 

Comment:    The Russian economy is booming. This is the second low cost carrier set up in Russia in the last year (“Sky Express set up in March 2006 and covering the European part of Russia).

 

Article:    The newly established low-cost air carrier company, A1, is looking for a base airport in the Moscow Region to make domestic flights and has had negotiations with two airports, Vnukovo and Domodedovo

 

 

6b/        Half of Gas from Shtokman Field to Be Liquefied     (FC Novosti, Fri 15 Jun)

 

http://www.fcinfo.ru/themes/basic/materials-rfcm-index.asp?folder=3192

 

Comment:    The extended version of the article states supplies should begin in 2013. Don’t hold your breath. Some observers think 2015 is too early. C1 + C2 reserves amount to 3.7 trillion cu m.

 

Article:    Gazprom plans to liquefy half of the natural gas produced at the Shtokman field and to send the other half to consumers, said Alexander Ananenkov, deputy chairman of the Management Committee of the Russian energy giant…

 

 

6c/        Russian Gas Supplies to China May Be Postponed            (FC Novosti, Wed 13 Jun)

 

http://www.fcinfo.ru/themes/basic/materials-rfcm-index.asp?folder=3192

 

Comment:    Surprise, surprise. No Russian gas for China, they don’t want to pay the market rate, as mentioned before. ‘Postponed to 2014-2015’ is Russian-speak for all deals are off. Russia may well be relieved, they can send the Kovykta gas west.

 

Article:    Russian energy giant Gazprom has not come to terms with China on price of gas supplies.

 

It is rumoured that the Chinese refused to buy gas at more than $100 per 1,000 cu m, while Gazprom cannot export gas so cheaply because in will soon supply gas to the domestic market at $125.

 

Experts said in this connection that gas supplies to China could be postponed from 2011 to 2014-2015.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

7/         Oil demand ‘rising faster than expected’         (Financial Times, Tue 12 Jun)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/76a4c516-18d6-11dc-a961-000b5df10621,s01=1.html

 

Comment:    “The [IEA] report estimated that world oil stocks could drop by 1m-1.5m barrels a day in the third quarter”. The IEA has previously reported that world oil stocks have fallen at about 1 Mb/d for the last two quarters i.e. six months.

 

Article:    World oil demand is rising faster than previously expected while non-Opec supply is growing more slowly, the International Energy Agency has said in its latest monthly assessment of the market.

 

The rich countries’ energy watchdog warned on Tuesday of growing tightness in oil supplies in the second half of the year, and urged the Organisation of the Petrolem Exporting Countries to raise its output.

 

David Fyfe, an analyst at the IEA, said: “We would very much hope that Opec production is at its seasonal low at the moment... We definitely do need more crude oil.”

 

The IEA now expects demand for oil to rise by 1.7m barrels a day this year compared to last year – an increase of about 2 per cent – and non-Opec oil supply to rise by just 900,000 b/d. That rise in demand is 167,000 b/d more than the IEA had previously estimated, while the rise in non-Opec supply is 97,000 b/d less.

 

The report estimated that world oil stocks could drop by 1m-1.5m barrels a day in the third quarter, which it said “would push forward stock cover down towards the low levels seen when prices accelerated higher in 2004. That is, by itself, a concern.”

 

Opec officials have played down the possibility of any increase in production before the next ministerial meeting in Vienna on September 11.

 

However, speaking to the FT at the beginning of June, Abdalla El-Badri, Opec’s secretary-general, left open the possibility of raising production later in the year, saying the decision would depend on what happened to oil stocks.

 

The IEA report, though viewed by analysts as supporting the price of oil, failed to prevent it falling during the morning. At mid-day in London, Brent crude was down 41 cents at $69.15 a barrel.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

8/         Boeing forecasts near tripling of air traffic      (Financial Times, Wed 13 Jun)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/cab4c1ba-19d0-11dc-99c5-000b5df10621,_i_nbePage=87ef6c98-3018-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2Fcab4c1ba-19d0-11dc-99c5-000b5df10621%2C_i_nbePage%3D87ef6c98-3018-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8.html&_i_referer=

 

Comment:    You need to log in for full story.  Obviously, Boeing is not just about to announce that its future is looking bleak because of Peak Oil.

 

Article:    Boeing, the world’s leading aerospace and defence group, on Wednesday forecast a near tripling of global air traffic in the next 20 years.

 

It said that passenger traffic was expected to grow by 5 per cent a year and air cargo by 6.1 per cent a year, despite its growing concerns about the impact of environmental pressures and inadequate airport and air traffic control infrastructure on rates of growth in the later part of the forecast period.

 

… Airlines have been ordering record numbers of new aircraft in the last two years, and Boeing forecast on Wednesday that the world commercial jet fleet would double in the next 20 years from 18,200 in 2006 to 36,400 in 2026.

 

Such growth would create a market for 28,600 new commercial passenger and freight aircraft worth $2,800bn in the 20 years.

 

**********************************************************************************************************