ODAC News

 

Sunday 29 July

 

The Oil Depletion Analysis Centre

 

 

The next newsletter will probably be Wed 8th August.

 

 

Peak Oil in the UK - BNP

1/   Politicians fret over wrong crisis as Peak Oil looms - FEEDBACK        (British National Party, July 2007)

 

Oil Prices

2a/  PETROLEUM ($US/bbl)    (Bloomberg, Wed 18 Jul)

2b/  Investec's Guinness sees oil price doubling    (Reuters, Thu 19 Jul)

2c/  Surging oil prices darken inflation outlook      (The Independent on Sunday, Sun 29 Jul)

 

Economy

3/   U.S. Foreclosure Filings Jump to Record in First Half  (Bloomberg, Thu 12 Jul)

6a/  Asia markets tumble as debt panic spreads   (The Times, Fri 27 Jul)

6b/  For all practical purposes the markets are closed right now     (The Oil Drum, Mon 30 Jul)

 

Coal in the USA

4/   Coal's Doubters Block New Wave Of Power Plants      (Wall Street Journal, Wed 25 Jul)

 

Big Oil

5a/  Scramble for oil catches up with Exxon         (MarketWatch, Thu 26 Jul)

5b/  Shell Bucks Trend With Q2 Earnings Growth (Energy Intelligence [International Oil Daily], Fri 27 Jul)

5c/  BP production drops again   (AllAfrica, Tue 24 Jul)

 

 

UK Energy

7a/  UK Energy Security (The Oil Drum: Europe, Thu 26 Jul)

7b/  Energy Trends         (UK DTI, June 2007)

 

Energy Crises in Sub-Saharan Africa

8/   Toiling in the Dark: Africa’s Power Crisis        (NY Times, Sun 29 Jul)

 

Middle East Energy Shortages

9/   DUBAI: Energy shortages could scupper plans - FEEDBACK  (Financial Times, Tue 24 Jul)

 

Russian Oil Production

10/  Russian oil output to plateau until 2020 – EconMin     (Reuters, Tue 24 Jul)

 

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

1/         Politicians fret over wrong crisis as Peak Oil looms - FEEDBACK          (British National Party, July 2007)

 

Comment:    Last Wednesday’s newsletter caused a stir because the first article was about a BNP (British National Party) article on Peak Oil. A few individuals thought of this as promoting the BNP. The BNP is an extreme right wing political party, which as mentioned before scares the living daylights out of ordinary folk. ODAC’s aim is to let ODAC News readers know what the BNP is saying/promoting on the grounds that it is better to be well-informed. In future when the newsletter contains BNP articles, it will be made clear who they are. See The Politics of Peak Oil and Fascism.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

2a/        PETROLEUM ($US/bbl)    (Bloomberg, Wed 18 Jul)

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/energyprices.html

 

                                    PRICE  CHANGE          % CHANGE      TIME

Nymex Crude Future      77.02    2.07                  2.76                  07/27

Dated Brent Spot           77.00    1.23                  1.62                  07/27

WTI Cushing Spot          77.02    2.07                  2.76                  07/27

 

 

2b/        Investec's Guinness sees oil price doubling  (Reuters, Thu 19 Jul)

 

http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=managerMoves&storyID=2007-07-19T080732Z_01_NOA929107_RTRUKOC_0_CITYWIRE-INVESTEC-GUINNESS.xml&pageNumber=0&imageid=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=InvArt-C1-ArticlePage2

 

Comment:    This really ought to be front page news, but I do not remember seeing this reported in anywhere (Reuters is a News Agency). As mentioned last week, it is ok for the IEA to forecast oil demand will outstrip supply over the next 5 years, and ok for the media to report this, but not ok to analyse what the consequences will be, yet.

 

Article:    Citywire AA-rated Tim Guinness believes the oil price will hit $150 a barrel by 2010 and shock people into reducing their dependence on the resource.

 

Guinness, manager of the Investec Global Energy fund, made his comments after last week's report from the International Energy Agency warned the world would face a "supply crunch" in 2012 due to poor output from non-Opec countries clashing with strong demand within the cartel's oil producers.

 

The report led to a spike in oil prices to their highest level in nearly a year at $72.65 a barrel, around $2 below its highest ever level.

 

Guinness agrees with the IEA forecast and expects the oil price to rise steadily over the next five years as supplies dwindle.

 

AA-rated Ian Henderson, manager of the JPM Natural Resources fund, said the oil price could double in five years.

 

He also warned there could be an oil shortage before this date due to lack of investment in the industry.

 

"The issue is about money and access. Not enough money is being invested in the industry and so the access to the oil reserves is not as good as it should be," said Henderson.

 

Guinness thinks that once oil hits the $150 mark it will be enough to force people to change their attitude to the commodity.

 

He said: "To control the oil price demand growth must be negative, which will happen when oil hits $150 and it will stay there until demand for oil falls."

 

Once the effects of this have been felt, Guinness expects the oil price to fall back to $100, which he believes should be the level at which it stays for the long term.

 

He said: "If I was Opec I would manage oil at this price. Energy accounts for 15 percent of world GDP spending and oil at $100 is tolerable."

 

Guinness believes once oil stays consistently at the $100 level the economy will turn its focus to alternative energy supplies.

 

He said: "$100 is a level at which alternative energy sources work economically and on a large scale."

 

 

2c/        Surging oil prices darken inflation outlook     (The Independent on Sunday, Sun 29 Jul)

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2814659.ece

 

Article:   Oil prices climbed to within a cent of a record close in New York on Friday, raising concerns about the effect of higher energy costs on inflation.

 

The surge is of particular concern as the threat of interest rate increases continues to alarm creaking global stock markets while adding to fears about a credit crunch.

 

In New York, crude closed at $77.02 a barrel, just below the $77.03 record set on 14 July 2006. Analysts said oil prices could keep rising next week, possibly breaking through the symbolic $80 mark.

 

Oil prices were lifted by a US Commerce Department report that showed American economic growth was a quicker-than-expected 3.4 per cent in the three months to the end of June. That pushed expectations about demand levels higher and saw traders buying up oil contracts.

 

In London, Brent crude rose by $1.08 to finish at $76.26 a barrel.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

3/         U.S. Foreclosure Filings Jump to Record in First Half         (Bloomberg, Thu 12 Jul)

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adIQXu4IeMsA&refer=home

 

Comment:    A couple of weeks old, but still relevant. More details on the US housing market slump.

 

Article:    Mortgage foreclosures in the U.S. jumped to a record in the first half as rising interest rates and falling home prices battered homeowners.

 

Almost 926,000 foreclosure notices were filed, 56 percent more than a year earlier and the most since Irvine, California- based RealtyTrac started tracking the data in 2005. Foreclosures were the highest last month in California and Florida, where some home prices have fallen as much as 25 percent, and Ohio and Michigan, where the automotive industry fired more than 50,000 people in the past 10 years.

 

The jump in 30-year mortgage rates by more than a half a percentage point since May is putting a crimp on borrowers with the best credit just as a crackdown in subprime lending standards limits the pool of qualified buyers. Foreclosures also are increasing as the supply of unsold homes hit a record 4.43 million in May, according to the National Association of Realtors.

 

Foreclosure rates in ``most states remained substantially above last year's levels,'' RealtyTrac Chief Executive Officer James Saccacio said in a statement.

 

In June, defaults surged 87 percent to 164,644 from a year ago, said RealtyTrac, a seller of foreclosure data, in the statement today. Last month's total was 7 percent lower than in May. California, Florida, Ohio and Michigan accounted for half the national total in June.

 

... U.S. home prices will drop 1.4 percent this year and housing starts will tumble in 2008 amid higher mortgage rates and a glut of properties for sale, the National Association of Realtors said yesterday. The Chicago-based group said the median home price was $223,700 in May, a 2.1 percent decrease from a year earlier.

 

An estimated 58 percent of properties in the foreclosure process are linked to borrowers with subprime loans, and RealtyTrac expects U.S. foreclosures to reach 1.8 million by year's end, Rick Sharga, a spokesman for the company, said in an interview.

 

... Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate in June with one filing for every 175 households, more than four times the national average of one per 704, RealtyTrac said. Nevada had 4,722 foreclosure filings, more than three times its total a year ago.

 

California had the second-highest rate, with one filing per 315 households, and the most filings overall, 38,801, for the sixth month in a row. Foreclosures in California, the most populous state, increased almost three-fold over a year ago.

 

Colorado had the third-highest rate with one foreclosure per 317 households. Florida was fourth with one per 347, followed by Arizona with one per 383, Ohio with one per 403 and Michigan with one per 420.

 

Six of the top 10 U.S. foreclosure rates for metropolitan areas were in California. Stockton, Merced, Modesto and Riverside- San Bernardino occupied the top four spots. Vallejo-Fairfield was seventh and Sacramento eighth.

 

Las Vegas had the fifth-highest foreclosure rate, Greeley, Colorado was sixth, Detroit was ninth and Miami was 10th.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

4/         Coal's Doubters Block New Wave Of Power Plants (Wall Street Journal, Wed 25 Jul)

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118532834584277100.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

 

Comment:    The similarities between US and UK energy policies are astounding. Both are a shambles, and both headed for relying on increasing supplies of spot natural gas, neither country willing to tackle the notion of using less energy as a deliberate policy even although it is becoming blatantly obvious they will eventually have to. It is worrisome that a member of the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission thinks natural gas can easily take the place of coal if necessary:  << That puts the focus on natural gas. "Gas is the bridge fuel" that will step in if coal stumbles, says Marc Spitzer, a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, regulator of the nation's wholesale gas and electricity markets.>>

 

Article:    From coast to coast, plans for a new generation of coal-fired power plants are falling by the wayside as states conclude that conventional coal plants are too dirty to build and the cost of cleaner plants is too high.

 

If significant numbers of new coal plants don't get built in the U.S. in coming years, it will put pressure on officials to clear the path for other power sources, including nuclear power, or trim the nation's electricity demand, which is expected to grow 1.8% this year. In a time of rising energy costs, officials also worry about the long-term consequences of their decisions, including higher prices or the potential for shortages.

 

As recently as May, U.S. power companies had announced intentions to build as many as 150 new generating plants fueled by coal, which currently supplies about half the nation's electricity. One reason for the surge of interest in coal was concern over the higher price of natural gas, which has driven up electricity prices in many places. Coal appeared capable of softening the impact since the U.S. has deep coal reserves and prices are low.

 

But as plans for this fleet of new coal-powered plants move forward, an increasing number are being canceled or development slowed. Coal plants have come under fire because coal is a big source of carbon dioxide, the main gas blamed for global warming, in a time when climate change has become a hot-button political issue.

 

... In the wake of the fading coal proposals, and others that are expected to follow, Citigroup downgraded the stocks of coal-mining companies last week, noting that "prophesies of a new wave of coal-fired generation have vaporized."

 

... Roadblocks for coal put greater attention on other sources. The U.S. power industry is exploring building more nuclear power plants. But those plans are several years away, and nuclear power currently provides only about a fifth of U.S. needs. Other sources, like wind, don't provide around-the-clock energy, while solar is relatively expensive and isn't yet capable of producing large amounts of electricity.

 

That puts the focus on natural gas. "Gas is the bridge fuel" that will step in if coal stumbles, says Marc Spitzer, a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, regulator of the nation's wholesale gas and electricity markets.

 

Currently, clean-burning gas provides roughly a fifth of the nation's power needs. But the nation's gas production has been flat, and other industries are increasingly using it as a fuel or raw material. Mr. Spitzer says that the nation needs more facilities to accept liquefied natural gas, which is gas cooled into a liquid that can be imported from overseas.

 

... Rising construction costs are another reason that the future looks murky for big coal burners. Duke Energy Inc. created a stir eight months ago when it announced that the expected cost of a new twin-unit power plant in North Carolina had ballooned to about $3 billion, up 50% from about 18 months earlier. That run up in cost and other factors compelled the North Carolina Utilities Commission to nix one of the two proposed units.

 

The coal industry is looking for ways to make its product more palatable. Earlier this week, Peabody Energy and ConocoPhillips said they are exploring the possibility of constructing a coal-gasification plant at a mine in Illinois, Indiana or Kentucky that would convert coal into 50 billion to 70 billion cubic feet of pipeline-quality synthetic gas a year. It said it would have its analysis completed in early 2008. It would be cost competitive at $5 to $6 per million British thermal units, which is less than today's prices.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

5a/        Scramble for oil catches up with Exxon          (MarketWatch, Thu 26 Jul)

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/scramble-oil-catches-up-exxon/story.aspx?guid=%7B26B26D77-74AD-484E-9110-8BFA3F94C0E7%7D

 

Comment:    MarketWatch reports that ExxonMobil’s production declined by 1%. The gist of the article is that we should expect production declines from Big Oil, but at least oil prices remain high.

 

“While other companies have increasingly boosted oil and gas reserves through acquisitions, Exxon stuck to the drill bit … ”  How did the Mobil get in ExxonMobil? Acquisition.

 

Article:    Commentary: Race for resources tightens as crude prices march ever higher

 

Exxon Mobil Corp is the world's biggest oil company. It didn't get there without lots of hard, smart field work.

 

While other companies have increasingly boosted oil and gas reserves through acquisitions, Exxon stuck to the drill bit, scouring the globe for new fields and making big, long-term investments to find, develop and produce petroleum.

 

This has kept Exxon at the head of its class in the reserve replacement derby so closely watched in the industry. Simply put, reserve replacement measures a company's ability to find oil as fast as it pumps it. Anything less means the company is going backward.

 

Today Exxon announced it went backward. Its second-quarter earnings report showed a production decline of 1% from a year ago.

 

While that hardly seems a significant drop, investors used to Exxon's stellar track record were alarmed enough to push Exxon's share price nearly 5% lower -- its biggest one-day drop in five months.

 

This is not the first time Exxon's output has dropped. And it certainly won't be the last as global demand for energy continues to push the hunt for oil ever farther into hostile environments, politically unstable or downright dangerous corners of the world.

 

Add to this the rise of national oil companies, many of which are moving beyond their own borders to compete for access to new exploration tracts. China is a prime example of a country pushing state-owned energy companies into the international arena to secure fuel for its booming domestic economy.

 

The search has taken China to Latin America, where it is fast-becoming a player in a region once dominated by U.S. oil companies. At the same time, Exxon last month decided to exit Venezuela rather than bow to government pressure to hand over majority control of its oil projects there to state-run Petroleos de Venezuela SA.

 

All this means Big Oil's romping ground is shrinking. The "easy" oil is long gone, the rest is getting harder to find, and competition for it is tougher than ever.

 

If there's any silver lining in all this for investors, it's that tight supplies and surging demand are keeping plenty of upward pressure on prices. Crude futures topped $77 a barrel Thursday in New York. And the view that energy prices can only go higher in the long run has supported a 15% increase in Exxon's share price this year.

 

But higher crude prices cannot offset losses from a creeping production decline for long. Which is why Wall Street goes so glum on the sector when its leader stumbles -- even just a little bit.

 

 

5b/        Shell Bucks Trend With Q2 Earnings Growth            (Energy Intelligence [International Oil Daily], Fri 27 Jul)

 

No link, from Energy Alert newsletter

 

Comment:    “a 2% decline in production”

 

Article:    Anglo-Dutch supermajor Royal Dutch Shell bested its main rivals Thursday with a 20% increase in second-quarter headline profits. The boom in earnings was led by record refining margins and one-time gains worth $660 million which more than offset a 2% decline in production.

 

 

5c/        BP production drops again         (AllAfrica, Tue 24 Jul)

 

http://business.iafrica.com/worldnews/267254.htm

 

Comment:    BP’s oil production has gone down again, but it has a few big fields coming onstream over the next couple of years.

 

Article:    British oil giant BP reported a drop in net profit for the three months to June on Tuesday, as energy production dropped for an eighth quarter running despite strong world demand for oil and gas.

 

... BP said on Tuesday that during the second quarter, oil production fell by 5.3 percent to 3.804 million barrels per day, as the group faced disruptions at US refineries.

 

The group said it expects production to reach an average for the year of 3.8 to 3.9 million barrels, in line with its guidance...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

6a/        Asia markets tumble as debt panic spreads   (The Times, Fri 27 Jul)

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article2150020.ece

 

Comment:    The ‘panic’, and the fall in the stock markets, was minimal, but do hint of a new era – an increasing squeeze on easy credit (higher interest rates and in the USA, tighter controls on who can borrow and how much, in an environment of falling house prices) combined with very high levels of debt.

 

Article:    Asian markets suffered their heaviest falls in four months today as anxieties about the credit crunch that had gripped Europe and the US yesterday spread to investors in the Far East.

 

The Nikkei 225 index lost 418.28 points, or 2.36 per cent of its value, to close at 17,283.81 on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

 

The index fell as much as 3 per cent late in the session before recovering some of its losses later.

 

... Markets in Hong Kong, China, Australia, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand also fell.

 

"You've got an economic impact from lower housing prices and housing demand," Simon Doyle, a strategist at Schroder Investment Management Australia, told Bloomberg.

 

... Yesterday panicked investors fled stock markets amid anxieties that the flood of cheap credit that has fuelled a global boom in corporate deals is drying up.

 

Mounting fears that a credit crunch will end the easy lending that has fuelled a wave of takeovers, and pushed shares to record highs, sent shockwaves through markets on both sides of the Atlantic.

 

... The severity of the losses, as fearful investors stampeded for the exits, triggered “circuit-breakers” at the New York Stock Exchange designed to put the brakes on sudden plunges in stocks. The broader S&P 500 index of US blue chips also dived by more than 2 per cent.

 

The latest in a series of triple-digit swings in the Dow’s value, as well as London’s heavy losses, was deepened as worries over the economic impact from the US housing market downturn were exacerbated by news that sales of new homes in America tumbled by 6.6 per cent last month in the largest drop since a 12.7 per cent plunge reported in January. A new jump in oil prices, to almost $77 a barrel, added to the edgy mood.

 

... Ryan Larson, a senior equity trader at Voyageur Asset Management, said: “The real concerns are about credit and oil pushing higher. Wall Street continues to walk a wall of worry.”

 

The anxieties were initially sparked by the shakeout in America’s sub-prime mortgage market amid a jump in defaults on loans made to high-risk borrowers. But worries have intensified this week as backers of big buyout deals have run into severe difficulty in securing finance, despite increased interest rates, raising the spectre of a broad “credit crunch”...

 

 

6b/        For all practical purposes the markets are closed right now         (The Oil Drum, Mon 30 Jul)

 

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2824#more

 

Comment:    ‘Jerome a Paris’ (Jerome in Paris) explains some of the issues relating to the tightening of global credit. Fairly short followed by, as usual, extensive comments.

 

Article:    While you've certainly heard of the big drop in the Dow Jones in the past two days, and probably heard that the housing market keeps on getting worse, the most ominous news are actually coming from a distinct part of the financial markets - leveraged debt.

 

That particular market, as suggests the quote I used in the title of the diary, is undergoing a dramatic change in mood as bankers, which had been bending over backwards to lend ever more money at ever more favorable conditions have suddenly decided that this was not a good idea and are brutally turning off the taps. Deals such as the huge $12 billion financing for the purchase of Chrysler by Cerberus have been canceled - or, to be more precise, the syndication of these deals has been killed, which means that the client will still get the money, but the banks that structured the deal initially and underwrote the loans (i.e. they committed to lending the money) won't be able to share that risk with others on the market and are stuck with it. For those deals already underwritten, the victims are the banks that did the deal; for deals not yet underwritten, the client won't see any money.

 

That market matters, as it is the one that has been feeding the private equity boom, i.e. the increasingly aggressive purchases of companies by funds which were able to bid high prices precisely because they could find cheap and easy finance. That boom had fueled the increase in stock market prices (with the price of targeted companies after jumping on such deals, and many others going up on speculation that they could be purchased) and in the price of many other assets - simply because buyers had lots of money.

 

It's the same kind of market that lent money to subprime lenders for them to on-lend to clients borrowing to buy overpriced houses (in the hope of flipping them quickly). As long as money was plentiful, prices kept on going up and the bet on them going up was vindicated, further fueling the boom.

 

Easy lending came through lower interest rates, and lower financing costs. Thus, for a while, higher acquisition prices (whether of homes or of other companies) did not translate into higher financing burdens, making such acquisitions not unreasonable proposals. But as interest rates increased (because of Fed-driven increases, out of inflation fears), these costs jumped up - at least for those borrowers on adjustable rates...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

7a/        UK Energy Security           (The Oil Drum: Europe, Thu 26 Jul)

 

http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/2790#more

 

Comment:    ODAC has tried to make the case over the last year that natural gas supplies for the UK, on which it is very dependent, are anything but secure. Euan Mearns goes much further and reviews oil, coal and natural gas, the UK balance of payments which are bad headed for rock bottom, amongst other things.

 

Article:    In 2006, 92% of the primary energy consumed in the UK was derived from fossil solar fuels - oil, natural gas and coal.

 

Not so long ago the UK was self sufficient in these energy resources but now we are importing increasing amounts of all three.

 

Dependency upon imported energy undermines UK national security and will have potentially dire consequences for the balance of trade.

 

UK Primary Energy Consumption - basic statistics

 

A beneficial attribute of the BP annual statistical review of world energy (used throughout this report) is that it shows primary energy consumption for the 5 principal energy sources normalised to millions of tonnes of oil equivalent. This eases comparison of energy consumption from oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and hydroelectric power as shown for the UK (click all charts to enlarge).

 

In 1965 (when BP records begin) 98% of UK primary energy was derived from burning fossil solar fuels for transporation and power generation purposes. By 2006, the proportion of fossil solar in the energy mix had fallen marginally to 92% - largely due to an increase in nuclear energy.

 

In this period, the energy mix has changed significantly. In 1965, no natural gas was used. But with the discovery and development of offshore natural gas in the North Sea, the proportion of natural gas in the UK energy mix has increased steadily since 1968 largely at the expense of burning coal.

 

In 1965, the UK population was 54,350,000 and this had grown to 60,245,000 by 2005

 

This equates to 3.6 tonnes oil equivalent per person per annum in 1965 and 3.8 tonnes oil equivalent per person per annum in 2005. UK per capita energy consumption has been essentially flat in the period. Energy efficiency gains in transportation, building standards and in more energy efficient appliances have been lost to an overall rise in living standards and more prolific use of energy in transportation, single occupancy dwellings, foreign travel etc.

 

Each person in the UK uses on average 10 kgs of oil equivalent energy every day. The main message of this post is that it is in the vital national interest that this profligate level of energy consumption (and waste) is substantially reduced.

 

I will now look at the oil, natural gas and coal production and consumption records for the UK for the past 40 years and show how swings from deficit to surplus and back to deficit have affected our overall balance of trade. I will also examine oil and gas production forecasts for the period to 2012 and project how this will affect the trade balance and energy security…

 

 

7b/        Energy Trends        (UK DTI, June 2007)

 

http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/statistics/publications/trends/index.html

 

Comment:    The DTI is now called the Dept for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Energy Trends is the quarterly publication from the DTI / BERR that summarizes UK energy statistics for each quarter, and June’s was recently published covering Jan-Mar 2007. A proper review of the data is required, but here are main points from the PDF file (717 Kb). Drop in gas production, 17% since the same quarter a year ago. Note that since the opening of the Langeled gas pipeline in Oct 2006, UK gas consumption for electricity has shot thro the roof, and conversely coal has dropped.

 

Article:    The main points for the first quarter of 2007:

 

Total energy production was 13˝ per cent lower than in the first quarter of 2006.

Oil production fell by 4˝ per cent compared to the first quarter of 2006. Production from older established fields continued to decline but this decline was partially offset by three new fields, including the very large Buzzard field.

Gas production was 17 per cent lower compared with the first quarter of 2006. Gas imports and exports increased by 50˝ per cent and 44 per cent respectively. The UK was a net importer of gas in the first quarter of 2007 by 91.2 TWh compared with 59.8 TWh in the first quarter of 2006. These figures reflect the decline of UK gas reserves. Gas demand was 3˝ per cent lower than a year earlier.

Total primary energy consumption for energy uses increased by 1 per cent. This was 1 per cent lower when adjusted to take account of weather differences between the first quarter of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007.

Final energy consumption decreased by 9 per cent, with falls in the domestic sector of 14˝ per cent, the industry sector of 9 per cent and the services sector of 6˝ per cent. There was a rise of 1˝ per cent in the transport sector.

Coal production was 28 per cent lower than a year earlier. Coal imports were 2.3 per cent lower than a year earlier. Generators’ demand for coal was down 21˝ per cent.

Coal supplied 23˝ per cent less electricity than in the same period a year earlier, while gas supplied 43 per cent more.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

8/         Toiling in the Dark: Africa’s Power Crisis        (NY Times, Sun 29 Jul)

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/world/africa/29power.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

 

Comment:    Eye-opening article on just how bad electricity supplies are in Sub-Saharan Africa, including South Africa.

 

Article:    … Power blackouts — “load shedding,” in utility jargon — are hardly novel in sub-Saharan Africa, where many electricity grids remain chewing-gum-and-baling-wire affairs. Even so, this year is different. Perhaps 25 of the 44 sub-Saharan nations face crippling electricity shortages, a power crisis that some experts call unprecedented.

 

The causes are manifold: strong economic growth in some places, economic collapse in others, war, poor planning, population booms, high oil prices and drought have combined to leave both industry and residents short of power when many need it most…

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

9/         DUBAI: Energy shortages could scupper plans - FEEDBACK     (Financial Times, Tue 24 Jul)

 

http://search.ft.com/nonFtArticle?id=070724000724

 

Comment:    This article from the FT about an energy crunch in the Middle East (Dubai) was Item 6 in last Wednesday’s ODAC News. A contact in the Middle East replies.

 

Article:    The article in the FT (DUBAI: Energy shortages could scupper plans) in your last newsletter sums up what I have been shouting about for several years - Dubai cannot power all the projects it has started let alone proposing, while a number of completed projects are running on hired generators as local utility DEWA (Dubai Electricity & Water Authority) has no spare capacity. In June the local paper had a report of how the Director of DEWA visited 1st Palm Island (there are 3 under construction, each progressively larger than other, + World, Dubailand etc. etc.) to assess its power demands - Island has been under construction for a number of years and people are moving into apartments and villas. Summer power cuts at 50C in the shade well prove great fun for rich retirees in a tax free haven !

 

Dubai's countless glass clad tower blocks are effectively solar ovens when the power goes off. In nearby Shariah there were 300 tower blocks built that local utility was unable to supply power or water to so they sit idle - speculation based on assumptions of limitless energy in this part of the world. Turning a square foot of desert sand into $1000's of real estate has increased local wealth for a lucky few immensely but without power it remains just a bit of desert (Similar to Las Vegas, Phoenix and countless other modern cities which I believe will share a similar fate)

 

Watched BBC World 2 days ago where they had a good report of power shortages in Kuwait. Net energy exports from Arabian Peninsula will decline fast - but then where is their food going to come from given some states effectively import 100% of their food needs? "Food for Oil" could be on the cards sooner than most expect - but if agricultural output declines due to energy shortages as predicted by so many - who will allow their own people to go hungry by exporting food to the Arabian Peninsula... Now I believe available oil and gas exports could decline at a far faster rate of 10% or above given all the energy dependent developments in this part of the world.

 

Dubai's population has increased 10 fold since 1979 while since 1991 oil output has declined well over 80%. The pattern is about to continue throughout the region.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

10/        Russian oil output to plateau until 2020 – EconMin (Reuters, Tue 24 Jul)

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL2477974720070724

 

Comment:    “Russian oil output to plateau until 2020”  - Putin has already hinted as much a couple of times earlier this year. However, the article does say a rise from 9.85 Mb/d now to about 10.6 Mb/d in future. Not much of a rise though. Did CERA, the group that says Peak Oil is garbage, not suggest Russia will increase output to 11.5 Mb/d by 2015? (Yes - only last March)

 

Article:    Russian oil production will remain largely unchanged until 2020, the Economy Ministry said on Tuesday, broadly confirming the country's existing energy strategy and the outlook by the International Energy Agency.

 

The ministry said in its long-term economic outlook that it expected Russian production to level off at 530 million tonnes a year (10.6 million barrels per day) between 2015 and 2020.

 

Russia, the world's second largest oil exporter after Saudi Arabia, produced 9.85 million bpd in June. Russia has been producing more crude than Saudi Arabia in the past year as Riyadh has been capping output below capacity levels.

 

Last month, the International Energy Agency (IEA), which advises 26 industrialised countries, said it expected Russian oil output to rise to 10.60 million bpd in 2010 but then fall to 10.50 million bpd by 2012.

 

The IEA also warned that Russia's 20 biggest development projects scheduled to come onstream in the next five years could face delays due to uncertainty over Russia's investment climate and tight drilling capacity…

 

**********************************************************************************************************